Leveraging the Practice of "Being Agile" to Design an Agile Management Curriculum

Introduction

The University of California Berkeley Extension (UCBX) Agile Management Program (AMP) integrates experiential, team-based learning projects with Agile content to enhance ‘Agile Being’ as well as ‘Agile Doing’. The design emphasizes use of Agile values and principles to understand, experience, apply, and adapt Agile methods and practices to specific situations.

During the 2013 summer session, a team of five students in the UCBX Agile Management Principles and Practices course self-selected to enable greater awareness of the AMP and to further leverage its Agile value and principle-centric character. The team was motivated by direct experience of the program’s unusually positive personal or workplace impact, and the relative lack of awareness of the AMP among potential participants.

Two of the authors (Berry and Thomas) had previously participated in an AMP team project to recommend practical ways for bringing the practice of Agile values and principles into US Federal Agency IT programs¹. That real world example furthered their thinking about the considerable value generated through the deliberate confluence of (a) Agile and (b) a generative approach to applying and adapting Agile methods to foster emergence of Agile values in specific contexts.

At the same time, they were struck by the contrast between the transformative impact the AMP was having on students, and the relative lack of awareness about this educational option among others who might benefit. At the outset of the subsequent AMP Principles and Practices class, three others with similar experiences (Jackson, Kabbara, and Swaminathan) joined these two to purse the work described here. End-to-end, the team had 5 weeks to prepare and execute the study as part of their class work.

“What would make the program even more valuable?”

“I would strongly suggest AMP retain an emphasis on the spirit of Agile. There remains an easy misconception that success is in the content rather than the mindset of being Agile. Are we too used to linking PM and Agile together to think these are based in methods or steps to outcomes? A seasoned PM recently told me he now knows the success is in the people.” - survey response from a UC Berkeley Extension AMP participant

Methods

Project Charter and Strategy

The team first established a charter to guide its work including a statement of purpose (vision, mission, and associated success measures), a set of working agreements, and definition of the context for team operations. The context discussions resulted in a Project Boundary Chart showing the team’s relationship to key stakeholders, and an overall strategy to achieve the team’s purpose. A prospective Analysis Chart was also created to identify the probability and likely impact of events (both positive and negative) which could affect the work.

The team adopted the following mission:

Recommending to UCBX AMP leadership an Agile, Lean, and sustainable strategy to raise (especially in the Northern California/ San Francisco Bay Area),

1. awareness and experience of Agile benefits,
2. awareness of AMP availability and its particular compelling value, and
3. support to the AMP among alumni, instructors, UC Berkeley staff, and professional organizations and companies”.

 Figure 1 displays these charter elements graphically.

Figure 1: Summary of the Charter for this Study.

(Click on the image to enlarge it)

Interview and Survey Design

Data and information to generate findings and related recommendations were obtained through a series of interviews with Agile education leaders, and through surveys of UCBX AMP students and potential students located in or near the San Francisco Bay Area. These were among key stakeholder groups identified in the Boundary Chart.

Interviews focused on discovering: (1) the rationale for the design of or participation in a specific Agile Management curriculum, (2) the attributes associated with that curriculum, and (3) the impacts of that curriculum.

Interviews were conducted with the UC Berkeley Extension AMP Program Director² and Marketing Manager, with two AMP faculty who also serve on the AMP Advisory Council³, with a leader of a group of AMP alumni working to Implement Agile in departments at UC Berkeley, with a UC Berkeley Haas Business School leader, and with one of two leaders of the Agile Project Management Program at UC Irvine.

A survey was created for UCBX AMP alumni and current students to understand their reasons for enrolling in the program, the value it had produced, how they had applied what they learned, and the impact it had on their results at work and in life.

Information was also sought on how UCBX alumni and current students learned about the AMP, and their recommendations on the most effective outreach channels going forward. Preferences for curriculum delivery were assessed (face-to-face, online live, online prerecorded, blended), and data on best times and locations for participation was collected. Questions also covered participant role at work, courses they had taken, and what would make the UCBX AMP even better.

Parallel surveys were conducted for two large “Meetup” groups drawing in Agile professionals from much of the San Francisco Bay region. These included the Bay Area Agile Leadership Network (Bay ALN) and the Silicon Valley Agile Leadership Network (Silicon Valley ALN). Survey responses were solicited from those who had not yet participated in the AMP.

Questions for these potential participants focused on what would be most important reasons for them to enroll in the UCBX AMP, the value or outcomes they would expect from participating, outreach channels that worked best for them, preferred means of delivery and location for the training, and their role at work. Potential participants were also asked if they were currently aware of the UCBX AMP.

Analysis of Interview Replies and Survey Data

• Information from interviews of Agile Management Program leaders, instructors, and marketing specialists was evaluated for patterns of response to questions on the rationale for the curriculum design and intended participant outcomes, attributes of the program including means and character of delivery and locations used, market segment focus, marketing intentions and practices, enrollment changes over time, future plans, and uncertainties or needs for further information. Understandings distilled from this analysis were used as a frame for reviewing survey responses, and as a direct source of recommendations.
• Survey data was reviewed by first examining tables and bar charts automatically generated by the survey software. The team especially noted items most commonly selected by participants, and those least commonly selected. Comparisons of these patterns were made between those who had participated in the AMP versus potential participants from the Meetup groups. Additional charts were prepared to better detect patterns and differences within and between these groups.
• The team also read through the list of written answers to questions on value received or desired, what changed as a result of participating in the UCBX AMP, the impact of those changes, and how the AMP could be made even more valuable. Items mentioned most frequently were noted, and charts were later prepared showing the frequency of specific statements made.
• The interview with the leader of the UC Irvine Extension (UCIX) Agile Management Project was used (along with study of the UCIX AMP website) to create a comparison chart between the two programs. The team intended to examine differences in content and focus, course delivery, and outreach channel strategy between the two programs, as well as to assess their complementarity.

Generating Findings and Recommendations

The overall patterns of responses to interview questions and of survey data were used to generate findings. It is important to note that the individual experiences of the authors (the team members) and their conversations with others acted as a background context and filter that influenced interpretation of results.

Commonly noted findings were rolled up into the Findings reported in the next section. Toward the conclusion of the project, each member of the team was asked to formulate recommendations based on the findings. A common set of recommendations was then prepared and is reported below the Findings section.

Findings

1. Interview Findings

1.1. Regarding the UCBX AMP:

1.1.1. Curriculum design and attributes:

1.1.1.1. UCBX AMP instructors deliberately designed an experiential, project-focused curriculum to instill Agile values and associated principles, and enable participants to put those into practice. This approach was intended to (a) embody Agile’s systemic nature, facilitating direct experience of the relationship of Agile methods to values and principles necessary for realization of Agile benefits. We also understood that this would (b) support students in gaining the self-generative ability to apply, adapt, or create appropriate Agile practices in many situations.

1.1.1.2. Curriculum focus on “Being Agile” required (a) live, in-person classes with a significant degree of interaction, trust building, and safety, and (b) individual class sessions long enough to enable the coherent building of momentum in leveraging and applying “Agile Being” to create effective “Agile Doing” (applying Agile practices)⁴. As a consequence, all UCBX Agile curriculum courses were offered in person, usually in full or multiple day formats. Interaction and self-organizing teamwork are an integral element of course design.

1.1.1.3. Recognition: UC Berkeley Extension issues an Award of Completion certificate with 90 hours required, including two required classes and a minimum of two electives. Total fees associated with the minimum are approximately $2600.

1.1.2. Impacts observed:

1.1.2.1. UCBX AMP instructors shared their experience of significant shifts in course participant attitudes, outcomes, and sense of the possible at work and in their personal lives (including expected outcomes described above). Instructor experiences matched observations of the authors during and following course work, and a number of comments made by alumni in the surveys.

1.1.2.2. Our interview with a leader of a group of AMP alumni working to Implement Agile in departments at UC Berkeley revealed that the UCBX AMP was proving to be a pivotal resource for training and inspiring UC Berkeley staff in working toward effective use of Agile approaches on the UC Berkeley campus.

1.1.3. Outreach strategy:

Initial outreach for the UXBX AMP included in-person group introduction sessions, brief presentations at Agile events in the region, participation at Agile conferences, and print media. After the first year, UCBX leadership reoriented outreach to mass media with a focus on raising general awareness of UCBX courses. This meant that specific AMP outreach and awareness raising was limited to standard brochures and catalog publication and a small number of in-person introductory sessions. While the mass media campaign helped overall UCBX enrollment, enrollment in the fledgling AMP dropped. Enrollment in the most recent year has increased. Word-of-mouth from AMP graduates and faculty is informally reported among students and faculty as a key factor in this increase. Survey results showed that the traditional catalog was also an important marketing force in raising awareness about the AMP.

1.1.4. Relationship of the UCBX Agile Management Program to the UC Berkeley campus business curriculum:

Our interview with a leader of one of the UC Berkeley Haas School of Business Centers showed potential synergy with the UCBX AMP regarding Agile-related teaching interests and the importance the foundational nature of experiencing “Being Agile” in creating value for students. However, existing funding streams and mechanisms do not incentivize a strong relationship or coordinated/collaborative efforts, and drive separate focus between these two potential academic partners.

1.2. UC Irvine Extension Agile Project Management (chosen as curriculum comparison case example):

1.2.1. UC Irvine Extension Agile curriculum design and attributes:

1.2.1.1. UC Irvine Extension’s educational focus is providing the technical Agile skills and training sought by tech employers in their region, and was therefore more technically oriented, consistent with other US-based Agile curricula we encountered. Courses are delivered on-line (with the exception of one experimental course). A wider range of methodology/technical course offerings is available than at UCBX, with sessions of less than full day duration. At the time of our interview, UCIX had been experimenting with how to make on-line courses more interactive.

1.2.1.2. Recognition: UC Irvine Extension awards an Agile Management Certificate with 150 hours required, including a specified set of 5 required classes and a minimum of 4 semester units of electives. Total fees associated with the minimum are approximately $5100.

1.2.2. Impacts observed:

UC Irvine Extension reported significant interest and participation from Southern California technology firms in their Agile curriculum, as well as satisfied students and graduates.

1.2.3. Outreach strategy:

1.2.3.1. UCIX has a very active, iterative Agile market research effort supporting rapid Agile program evolution (using student inquiries about the UCIX Agile program, local/regional employer and participant interviews and relationship building, and paid marketing studies).

1.2.3.2. UCIX also uses incoming email and phone inquiries about the AMP to immediately engage potential participants and employers in a market research, enrollment, and coaching conversation that explores: (a) how they learned about the program, (b) the value they want out of the AMP, and (c) how the AMP can meet their specific requirements, leading to development of initial curriculum plans for those individuals.

1.2.3.3. UCIX is also experimenting with e-oriented outreach channels. Sharing of market research findings and experiences between UCIX and UCBX, with UCB campus counterparts, and with others in the UC system appears to hold the potential for substantial mutual value.

2. Findings from Customer Surveys

2.1. Survey Responses from Current AMP Students and Alumni

Major patterns observed:

2.1.1. Who responded to the survey:

2.1.1.1. The response rate was approximately 27% using a best-constructed non-duplicate AMP email list maintained by alumni (32 total respondents) as the base population size

2.1.1.2. The blue (left-most) bars in each cluster in Figure 2 show how these respondents categorized their professional role. The top two categories were “Project Leader or Manager” and “Business Professional”.

Figure 2: Role of Survey Respondents.

2.1.2. Curriculum design and attributes:

2.1.2.1. Participants highly valued the:

• current AMP learning experience.
• in-person workshop interaction.
• core foundation of Agile values, principles, and practices.

63% rated “Gain Agile leadership and/or management abilities” and 41% “How to think, and be, Agile” as among their most important reasons for participating in the UCBX AMP, while only 31% rated “Gain specific Agile technical knowledge or skills” as one of their most important reasons for participating.

The blue (left-most) bars in each cluster in Figure 3 show the full set of important reasons for enrolling in the AMP.

Figure 3: Most Important Reasons for Enrolling in the UCBX AMP

(Click on the image to enlarge it)

2.1.2.2. In written responses to the question “What would make the program even more valuable?” the most frequent responses were:

• full certification upon completion of course requirements,
• add courses, particularly in the areas of Agile Leadership and Agile practice/methodology

2.1.2.3. Course location:

• Physical locations were the most popular, with interest in blended physical and online.
• A central location in the region (San Francisco at 78%, followed by Berkeley at 63%) was most favored for physical courses, followed by much lower percentages for areas to the north, south, and east depending on location of participants.
• Online was not popular among AMP alumni and current students (9% for on-line live, and 3% for 24/7 recorded), as respondents preferred (or at least in some cases had seen the importance of) in-person interaction, though minds were open to an appropriate blended physical and online approach (38%).

“Considering the quality and value of the experience you want from AMP courses, what locations would work for you?”

“Agile really benefits from face to face.” - survey response from a UC Berkeley Extension AMP participant

2.1.2.4. Course timing:

• Weekends work for many current AMP participants and alumni (78% selected this as a time which would work for them).
• Evenings were less popular - a backup choice that would work for 44% of alumni and current participants.
• Friday was a close third at 41%.
• Full days courses were preferred over half day courses by 2 to 1.

2.1.3. UCBX AMP impacts on participants:

2.1.3.1. A plurality of written comments noted significant shifts or value gained in work contexts as a result of participating in the AMP. Some also commented on similar effects in their personal life.

2.1.3.2. Here are written statements volunteered by survey respondents’ about the value, application, and impact of the UCBX AMP⁵:

What value have you received from the Agile Management Program?

How have you applied what you learned?

What Impact has this had on the results you produce?

2.1.4. Outreach strategy:

2.1.4.1. Main ways UCBX AMP alumni and current students found out about the AMP (Survey respondents could select more than one answer): 

• printed or online catalog or brochure (81%)
• colleague or friend (34%).
• email (22%)
• employer recommendation (10%).

None reported learning about the AMP through radio or TV advertising.

2.1.4.2. Best ways going forward to market the AMP according to alumni and current students:

• Catalog and brochures (44%)
• colleagues or friends (41%)
• online social media like LinkedIn, Facebook, Google+ (34%)
• website or blog (28%)
• recommended via an employer (28%)
• email (22%)
• webinars (22%).

2.2. Survey Responses from Potential AMP Participants

Major patterns observed in survey responses from potential participants in the San Francisco Bay Area Agile Leadership Network (BA ALN0 and in the Silicon Valley Agile Leadership Network (SV ALN):

2.2.1. Who responded to the survey:

2.2.1.1. The response rate was approximately 3% from the BA ALN and 2% from the SV ALN (24 and 18 responses, respectively) using Meetup mailing lists of approximately 1000 each in which duplicate names had not been removed.

2.2.1.2. The green bars in each cluster in Figure 2 show how the combination of these two ALN groups categorized their professional role. The top two categories were “Project Leader or Manager” and “Agile Coach or Scrum Master”.

Figure 2 repeated: Role of Survey Respondents.

2.2.2. Curriculum design and attributes:

2.2.2.1. Which would be most important if enrolling in the UCBX AMP (more:

• “Gain Agile leadership and/or management abilities” (62%)
• “How to think, and be, Agile” (40%)
• “Gain Specific Technical knowledge or skills” (31%).

The green bars in each cluster in Figure 3 show the full set of important reasons for potential participants in the ALN enrolling in the AMP.

Figure 3 repeated: Most Important for Potential Participants if Enrolling in the UCBX AMP

(Click on the image to enlarge it)

2.2.2.2. In written responses to the question “What would make the program even more valuable?” the most frequent responses were:

• More on Agile methods and practices, particularly practical application and adaption in different circumstances encountered in practice, and at scale.
• Enabling the practice of Agile values and principles among organizational leaders and middle managers, and Agile transformation.
• Perspectives and discussion with those experienced with Agile implementation.

2.2.2.3. Course location:

• Central physical locations were the most popular (61% and 57% for the top physical location for the BA ALN and SV ALN, respectively), with interest in 24/7 online the second most popular (57%) among BA ALN respondents, and blended physical and online second most popular (50%) among the SV ALN respondents.

2.2.2.4. Course timing for live training:

• Evenings (66%) and weekends (51%) were preferred by potential participants.
• Potential participants from the ALN preferred shorter sessions, as survey respondents rated both full day and half day options lower than 20%.

2.2.2.5. Overall, potential participants from the ALN:

• Recognized the importance of actually implementing Agile values and principles in leadership, management, and methodology in order to obtain promised benefits of Agile.
• At the same time, tended to think about course offerings more in terms of technical Agile methods training.
• Valued the importance of in-person workshops and longer individual sessions less than those who had experienced the UCBX AMP.

2.2.3. Outreach strategy:

2.2.3.1. Only about one third of current SV ALN respondents and one half of BA ALN respondents were aware of the existence of the UCBX AMP.

2.2.3.2. Best ways going forward to market the AMP according to potential participants from the ALNs:

• email (62%)
• website or blog (55%)
• colleagues or friends (31%)
• recommended via an employer (31%)
• online social media like LinkedIn, Facebook, Google+ (29%)
• Catalog and brochures (29%)
• webinars (24%).

The preferences for the first two channels -- email, and website or blog –differed dramatically from those recommended by current students and alumni as seen in Figure 4 below.

Figure 4: Preferred Outreach Channels/p>

(Click on the image to enlarge it)

Conclusions and Associated Recommendations

The value of “Being Agile” as a Foundational Curriculum Element was Substantiated.

The UCBX AMP has demonstrated its power to prepare its participants for being and doing Agile in environments of rapid change.

1. The value of using a “Being Agile” focus on Agile values and principles as a foundation for Agile’s effective application is (1) producing results for UCBX AMP participants and is (2) becoming appreciated as an important and valuable learning element by those who participate in the UCBX AMP.
2. The importance of employing Agile values and principles in reaping the potential benefits of Agile methods is also known by many potential participants, but the implications for Agile curriculum content, form, and process/delivery is not.

Recommendation: Enrich the Core UCBX Agile Curriculum As a Foundation for Agile Pathways

• Steward and further enrich the current, essential character of the AMP, with its focus on “being” Agile to enable self-organizing application of tools for “doing” Agile effectively and successfully. Doing so focuses on ensuring achievement of the enduring outcomes and value desired by current and potential participants (customers), even though some curriculum elements and the degree of interaction and physical presence required may not seem familiar or necessary to those who have not yet participated.
• Add a differentiated set of required courses (for example, Introduction to Agile Management, Transition to Agile, and Agile Leadership) to the core curriculum.
• Sequence core courses to provide an Agile values/systems context for specific Agile tools/methodologies electives, enhancing the probability of successful Agile practices application, leverage, and delivery on the promise of significant value creation.

The Desire and Demand Exists in Both Existing and Potential Participants to Expand Agile Methodology Offerings.

Recommendation: Evolve Electives to Enable Differentiation & Choice of Pathways

• Add electives to enable distinct pathways for Agile leadership and management, and for Agile technical operations. Clearly differentiate the outcomes and content for each elective, enabling students to choose courses and create the pathway appropriate to their needs.
• Populate the Agile leadership and management pathway with electives that match current customer requirements and priorities (examples include Quality and Risk Management in Agile, Agile Product Ownership, Agile Estimation and Planning).
• Populate the Agile technical operations pathway with electives that match current customer requirements and priorities (examples include Agile Management Using Scrum; Agile Management Using XP; Agile Management Using Lean; Agile Management using DSDM, Advanced KANBAN Metrics).
• ‘Instantly’ add to Agile/Lean tool and technical course choices by crediting coursework taken elsewhere in the UC system (for example through the UCIX Agile Project Management Program).
• Make selected Agile Management electives available as electives in the UC Berkeley Extension Project Management certification curriculum. Common cause exists between UC Extension Agile programs and between UC Berkeley business curricula and the UC Berkeley Extension AMP, and value to students could be enhanced by greater collaboration among these institutions.

Possibilities Exist for Experimenting with Additional Curriculum Delivery Options which Both Protect Essential Requirements for Enabling Participants to Reap the Benefits of Agile Being While Addressing Participant Availability Constraints.

Recommendation: Explore Course Delivery Options that Match Prospective Student Priorities

• Prospective student survey data indicates a modest desire for on-line Agile course availability. In the short term, consider publicizing the availability of on-line courses through the UCIX Agile Project Management Program, and the ability to transfer credits for up to two classes within the UC Extension system.
• Experiment, possibly in cooperation with UCIX Agile, with on-line delivery of one or more specific content chunk slices, and with interactive on-line support to individuals or teams working on class assignments between face-to-face sessions.
• On an experimental basis, explore longer evening classes which minimize interruption and the building of momentum in the class. Expand the set of courses at UCBX Belmont for those coming up from the south Bay Area, to match priorities revealed in our survey of prospective students.

The Value and Benefits of Leveraging,an Agile Curriculum with a “Being Agile” Core Foundation Will be Very Limited Unless the Availability, Character, and Benefits of this Type of Curriculum are Known. Significant Potential Exists for Improving UCBX AMP Marketing Results.

Although the program is well positioned to 'catch the Agile wave,' its lack of visibility and the lack of visibility of its results and deeper value has limited growth.

1. A majority of local potential AMP participants who responded to the surveys were not aware of the existence of the program.
2. A number of important outreach channels preferred by existing and potential AMP participants are unused or are being given low emphasis.

There are many Agile, innovative marketing, outreach, and networking tactics that can change this situation and help the Program deliver value to a rapidly expanding customer base.

Recommendation: Strengthen Marketing Through Channels that Match Customer Preferences

• Engage a broader market of prospective students via increased on-line marketing to include email, websites/blogs, webinars, and social media.
• Build out the UCBX AMP website, creating a blog with Alumni guest posts, and placing testimonials front and center (text, images, videos, and audio) with offers by alumni to speak to those interested in participating the AMP.
• Funnel/mirror some or all AMP website content on the AMP alumni site, YouTube, LinkedIn, and other professional social network sites.
• Use incoming email and phone inquiries about the AMP to immediately engage potential participants and employers in a market research, enrollment, and coaching conversation that explores: (a) how they learned about the program, (b) the value they want out of the AMP, and (c) how the AMP meets their specific requirements.
• Celebrate the “graduation” of Agile learners by organizing a public event that will generate publicity.
• Measure ROI of various outreach channels in connecting with potential participants, and with employers who want to sponsor AMP employee training: Adapt marketing budget and tactics to match results. each – Final Report

Recommendation: Tap Networking Power for Enhanced Outreach

• Develop stronger links to Agile campus resources at UC Berkeley (faculty, staff, informal UC Berkeley Agile working group(s) and Centers within the Haas School of Business).
• Leverage the networking potential of the program as a value-adding element by creating meet-ups and events for current learners and alumni, and by sponsoring, attending, and being visible at Agile/Lean Conferences and events.
• Use networking to insure key Agile employers in Northern California are aware of UCBX AMP value, how to contact graduates, and how to take advantage of the AMP (for example, encourage UCBX instructors and alumni to offer face-to-face information sessions at their companies).
• Encourage alumni, satisfied employers, instructors, and UCBX staff to speak at ALN, other Agile/Lean professional groups, and at Project Management Institute (PMI) to create visibility and employer engagement.
• Actively invite referrals to the AMP through the e-mail list of AMP alumni and instructors.

Participant Effort and Generative Ability to be Effective in Employing Agile Values and Practices as a Result of Completing the AMP is Under Recognized and Under Acknowledged.

Recommendation: From Sequence to Certificate: Offer Full Certification for the AMP

• Develop a full Certification pathway for the AMP (150 instructional hours with designated required and elective courses) including possible additional certifications related to specific subject or practice areas.

Continued Curricula Development Would Benefit from an Even Greater Use of an Important Agile Value: Systems Thinking.

Recommendation: More Widely and Thoroughly Apply Systems Thinking & Approach to UCBX Agile Management Program 

• Assess Agile industry trends and program models annually via UC Extension system-wide collaborative studies.
• Use on-going, iterative surveys of customers and employers in the UCBX local region to understand the priorities and preferences that drive enrollment.
• Draw on Agile trend studies and local assessments to inform annual curriculum development, course scheduling, and marketing initiatives.
• Establish Centers of Agile/Lean Excellence within the UC Extension system (based on program focus).
• Enable transfer of credit and participation in courses from all UC Agile sponsors (in accordance with lead campus program requirements - the campus with whom the student is enrolled).

Presentation of Study and Follow-Up

Study intent, methodology, findings, and recommendations were presented to the full UCBX AMP Principles and Practices class on July 20, 2013, with several guests in attendance. The final report and survey statistics summaries were circulated to all those interviewed, and to those interested from the two ALN groups surveyed. A meeting was held with UCBX AMP leadership to discuss the study’s findings and recommendations. The Director of the AMP stated that study was of significant value, and that discussions of its recommendations with AMP faculty would go forward.

In retrospect, engaging customers to identify features they wanted in the UCBX AMP curriculum provided a real world example of Agile values, principles, practices, and benefits in action. This project (conducted in a brief 5 week set of iterations) created value for:

1. The students conducting the study (two have now joined the UCBX AMP faculty),
2. Current faculty, leadership, and marketing for the UCBX AMP, and
3. Potential participants.

“What Impact has this had on the results you produce?”

“I have been able to produce more work, not waste as much time, and find more joy in getting things done. :) ”

“The teams that I worked with became more aware of time, business value, and feedback loops. As a result, they delivered faster and more efficiently.”

“1. Quicker discovery of what initiatives hold promise, and which are of lesser value. 2. Faster production of incremental value. 3. Greater involvement of customers in product development.”

¹ This earlier AMP team project, Improving Federal Adoption of Agile IT Methods, took as a starting point findings from a July 2012 US General Services Administration report (12‐681) showing the value, practicality, and necessity for employing Agile approaches in US Federal IT development efforts. The class team, composed of professionals from different sectors, made several recommendations: (1) Federal Blue Ribbon Panel to identify and refine best Agile practices, (2) engagement of Agency leadership in promoting Agile change and in adapting best practices, (3) streamlining to Agile practices in planning, procurement, reporting, and compliance, (4) facilitating collaboration, commitment, and continuous learning at the project team level, and (5) initiating implementation through pilot projects.

² Mr. Tom Kendrick, UC Berkeley Extension, Agile Management Program Director, & Program Director for Project Management.

³ These were Pat Reed and Ainsley Nies, key founding UCBX AMP faculty who played a major role in setting the character and direction of the AMP. They also served as our Principles and Practices paired instructor team.

⁴ The two AMP instructors interviewed said that, in their experience, current evening class lengths limit buildup of learning velocity and momentum (similar to Agile understanding of productivity at work).

⁵ Comments in quotes are from separate individuals in response to each question (only one comment per person per question). Only a portion of respondents responded to each question. As authors of the paper were allowed to take the survey, their comments (if they choose to respond to a given question) are also included here.

About the Authors

Susan E. Berry is a partner in Aligned for Results, LLC, where she helps people collaborate to craft a compelling vision for their company, team, or community, and use Agile processes to bring their vision to life.  She draws on extensive experience facilitating collaboration in contexts from local to global. Work roles include UN World Health Organization Staff Development and Training Officer, Training Consultant for the US Office of Personnel Management, and Director of Ed/Tech Service for Rural Community Assistance Corporation.  MA, University of Wisconsin-Madison, NLP Practitioner, CSM®, CSPO®, Innovation Games® Certified Collaboration Architect, and graduate of the UC Berkeley Agile Management Program.   See full one page bio here.

Christian Jackson is an experienced organizational change and efficiency consultant based in the San Francisco Bay Area, having served organizations including the Kaiser Permanente health care system.  Melding people and technical skills, he is focused on finding ways to do things better, easier, and more robustly.  Christian helps those he is assisting improve communication, interaction, and relationships between systems and between people, including better shared use of resources.  He is active in community activities, supporting non-profit initiatives such as introducing men to a wider (and co-incidentally healthier) palate, and a joint effort between Eating Healthy, UC Berkeley and Kaiser helping residents access local resources in improving their health outcomes.

Nadine Kabbara is a Learning and Development consultant with more than 15 years of international experience. She is a seasoned business trainer and has designed, developed, and delivered numerous corporate learning programs, and has coached professionals in career planning and development. Prior to that, as Manager at Deloitte consulting, Nadine led global Human Capital projects and Organizational Development initiatives.  Nadine holds an MBA and is a certified Senior Professional in Human Resources (SPHR) and a certified Project Management Professional (PMP). She is also certified in Instructional Design, covering the latest technology and trends in the Learning and Development (L&D) field. As an experienced project management practitioner and trainer, Nadine is highly interested in the transition of professionals and organizations from “traditional” project management to Agile approaches. She has recently completed the program “Agile Management” at UC Berkeley Extension, and has joined the program’s team of instructors.

Balasubramanian Swaminathan is currently working as a Senior Agile Program Manager (Strategic Management) and performs Agile Management coach role at CPP Inc. He also currently works at UC Berkeley Extension as Adjunct Instructor for Agile Management. He has an overall 17+ years of software industry and management experience. Bala is an Engineer (BS – Electronics and Communication Engineer) and MBA (Marketing) graduate holder.  He had worked as an R&D Engineer in the field of Real-Time Embedded Systems.  Bala held different senior roles in R&D Software industries (to mention few: Healthcare, Security Control, Automotive and Radar Communication System). He had also worked in the Product Support Group as Sr. Project Manager offering outstanding customer product support (Radiation Oncology) and also performed Sr. Technical Project Manager in the R&D group (Radiation Oncology).  He is PMP certified, PMI-ACP and CSP (Certified Scrum Professional) and CSM certified. He had also completed the formal education in Project Management, Project Human Resource Management and Agile Management in UC Berkeley Extension.

Randall W. Thomas as partner at Aligned for Results, LLC, assists individuals, teams, and organizations to produce exceptional value. His passion is enabling people to discover and apply their tremendous abilities to self-vitalize, create, and work together in common purpose.  Former University of California Berkeley Principal Investigator and Senior Fellow in the eco/geospatial science and technology sector, and UN consultant and visiting scholar at European Universities serving initiatives that spanned large area spatial data/information applications, project development, budgeting, implementation, collaboration, and training.  PhD, MS, BS, University of California Berkeley, NLP Practitioner, CSM®, CSPO®, Innovation Games® Certified Collaboration Architect, UC Berkeley Extension Agile Management Program Award of Completion. See full one page bio  here.